Solutions

Company energy report

The report the board and the auditor can read: SEU list, EnRC results, and documented information from the same programme.

Request a quote Why teams choose AEYS

ISO 50001:2018
TS EN ISO 50001:2018

Certification week fails when the report is a collage: SEU list from one workbook, charts from another, and narrative that no longer matches the plant. AEYS writes the company energy report from the programme that operations already run.

Operators see units, mappings, and predict overflow. Customer programme owners see intake, documented information, and reports. Linked accreditors review the same programme without owning the plant database. That split is how AEYS stays useful after certification week is over.

What you get

Written to TS EN ISO 50001:2018: The report structure follows the EnMS, not a marketing PDF. Energy review, SEUs, performance, and documented information stay in one pack.
Numbers that match the models: Actual-versus-predicted tables and SEU narratives are pulled from the same EnRC runs operations used, not re-typed into slides.
Accreditor review without a second system: The linked accreditor opens the programme AEYS already holds. They do not need a copy of the historian.
Still useful in year two: Surveillance needs an updated pack, not a reprint. Because the report is generated from live mappings and models, the loop continues.

Frequently asked

Can we export to PDF or Excel?: Yes. The report centre produces the pack from the same programme data. The point is that the export is a snapshot of a living EnMS, not the only copy of the truth.
Who sees which pages?: Operators, customer programme owners, and linked accreditors have different shells. They read the same evidence; they do not share the same plant-database login.

What you get

Written to TS EN ISO 50001:2018

The report structure follows the EnMS, not a marketing PDF. Energy review, SEUs, performance, and documented information stay in one pack.

Numbers that match the models

Actual-versus-predicted tables and SEU narratives are pulled from the same EnRC runs operations used, not re-typed into slides.

Accreditor review without a second system

The linked accreditor opens the programme AEYS already holds. They do not need a copy of the historian.

Still useful in year two

Surveillance needs an updated pack, not a reprint. Because the report is generated from live mappings and models, the loop continues.

Frequently asked

Can we export to PDF or Excel?

Yes. The report centre produces the pack from the same programme data. The point is that the export is a snapshot of a living EnMS, not the only copy of the truth.

Who sees which pages?

Operators, customer programme owners, and linked accreditors have different shells. They read the same evidence; they do not share the same plant-database login.